Can you remember the the so-called Big 5 personality types?
1. O
2. C
3. E
4. A
5. N
Signposting:
1 Let’s ____ turn to
...
2 I’d like to start ____ outlining ...
3 So ____ give an
example ...
4 a ____ point ...
5 I want to come back to that a bit later ____.
a introduce a section of the lecture
b move to a new topic
c signal a point that will be reinforced later in the
lecture
d to support a claim
e to signal an important idea
In these examples of signposting expressions there are two
missing words. Add the words you think will complete them.
1 Having looked at key concepts let’s now recent research on
the topic.
2 I’d like to start the three main areas of research that
I’m going to talk about.
3 So to example, a person in the fourth category is likely
to donate money to charity.
4 Earlier a study by Matz, Gladstone and Stillwell ...
5 So those are some example case studies – I want to to them
later on
6 This is relevant to high income earners. What I that is
people whose salary is over $100,000 a year
7 Now that we’ve looked at four different research studies,
I’d like some specific examples
Note taking:
Well-being and salary levels - 3 studies
1. $75,000 (Kahneman & Deaton 2010)
increase of wellbeing up to 75k
2. $80,000 – $200,000 (Clingingsmith 2016)
clear rise in wb up 80k
80k- 200k much smaller rise
no rise after 200k
3. ‘Satiation point’ (Stevenson & Wolfers 2013)
found no ‘Satiation point’ due to increase in wealth
Extension
Read the extract:
"Markets create wealth. Okay, so I used to teach
contract law, and if you really want to go back to first principles: On the
first day, I used to take my watch off and I would sell it to someone in class.
We’d agree on a price, $20. Then the question I always asked the students was:
What did the buyer value the watch at? Much of the class would say $20.
That’s not the right answer.
Discuss why the writer feels "$20" is not the right answer.
Now read on
All we know is that the person would rather have the watch
than have the $20 bill. What did you know about the value I placed on it?
Exactly the inverse. I’d rather have the $20 bill than have the watch. Now,
most people think the benefit of markets is: I walked away with a $20 bill,
great, which I valued more highly than the watch, and you walked away with the
watch that you valued more highly than the $20, but look at all the excess
value there.
Maybe you wanted that watch because it completed your fabulous
watch collection or you desperately needed a watch or it was so attractive to
you that the value you placed on it would be in the hundreds of dollars. You
got all that surplus value, and me, I really needed that $20. I had an
investment opportunity over here for that $20 that has yielded a manifold
return for me. That’s how markets create additional value."
- U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren
1. Is Senator Warren right?
2. Is this always how markets work?
No comments:
Post a Comment